• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

When It Comes to Drug Development, What Do Our Dollars Buy?

by Marlene Piturro, PhD, MBA • July 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

When comparing drug development times between 1985 and 1995, the average time was just over 10 years. For 1992 through 2002 the authors reported the median times for clinical trials and regulatory review were 5.1 years and 1.2 years, respectively. They conclude that the relative value of drugs in their therapeutic classes and market dynamics have more impact on cost than drug development times. Drugs with annual projected sales of $1 billion or more took one year less to develop than drugs with lower profit potential. (See Development Time for Drugs by Highest Annual Sales, above, for the clinical trial and regulatory times for some of the last decade’s blockbuster drugs.)

You Might Also Like

  • Drug Marketing: Different Impacts on Different Physicians
  • Prescription Drug Benefit Primer
  • Rising Drug Costs Create Concern About Drug Diversions
  • AMA’s Opt-Out Provision for Sale of Physician Prescribing Data Seen as First Step
Explore This Issue
July 2006

According to the authors, drug development costs averaged $868 million per NME, with a range of $500 million to over $2 billion, depending on therapeutic classes and the developing company.

Better Processes Can Encourage Innovations

Dr. Keyhani and colleagues also propose that improvements in the regulatory process, particularly FDA “fast tracking” of drug approvals, allow for speedier trials and lower clinical trial costs. The same legislation that allowed for fast tracking also permits faster development of orphan drugs.

Table. Development Time for Drugs by Highest Annual Sales

click for large version
Table. Development Time for Drugs by Highest Annual Sales

The streamlined regulatory process has allowed Zila, Inc., a small pharmaceutical company based in Phoenix, to move swiftly with OraTest, an oral cancer-specific rinse being evaluated for its efficacy in early detection of oral cancers in high risk patients.

Zila received a special protocol arm from the FDA for Phase III clinical trials, which accelerates the trials and allowed Zila to cut its R&D costs by enrolling fewer than 4,000 high-risk patients in 13 sites including Johns Hopkins University, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, and New York University’s College of Dentistry. Zila’s CEO Douglas Burkett, PhD, hopes that OraTest will improve oral cancer detection. “Currently, almost 70% of oral cancers are detected late in the disease, leading to low five-year survival rates. If the OraTest clinical trial succeeds, we hope to improve the survivability of this cancer,” said Dr. Burkett.

Still, the most recent research indicates that drug development times may not be a factor in rising drug prices, and that the costs of new drug development vary widely, from $500 million all the way up to $2 billion. While we may not like high prescription drug costs, Dr. Goldrich reminds us “high drug R&D costs are the price of progress.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Medical Education, Practice Management Tagged With: cost, finance, healthcare reform, medication, pharmaceuticals, policy, treatmentIssue: July 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Drug Marketing: Different Impacts on Different Physicians
  • Prescription Drug Benefit Primer
  • Rising Drug Costs Create Concern About Drug Diversions
  • AMA’s Opt-Out Provision for Sale of Physician Prescribing Data Seen as First Step

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939