• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

When It Comes to Drug Development, What Do Our Dollars Buy?

by Marlene Piturro, PhD, MBA • July 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

What does bother him is the pharmaceutical industry’s huge investment in direct to consumer (DTC) advertising; “They are using the patient as a proxy for the physician since government oversight of drug companies’ contacts with physicians has intensified,” said Dr. Goldrich. “I’m very cognizant of that change, and vigilant that my decisions about what to prescribe are never influenced by what the patient has been bombarded with through drug company marketing,” he added. That means more of his time spent dispelling the marketing messages that patients receive from drug advertising.

You Might Also Like

  • Drug Marketing: Different Impacts on Different Physicians
  • Prescription Drug Benefit Primer
  • Rising Drug Costs Create Concern About Drug Diversions
  • AMA’s Opt-Out Provision for Sale of Physician Prescribing Data Seen as First Step
Explore This Issue
July 2006

The sense that heavy DTC advertising for new drugs inflates overall spending is reflected in a December 2003 study by Bain & Co. that puts an NME’s cost at $1.7 billion, 55% higher than the average from 1995 to 2000. It cited skyrocketing marketing budgets for new drugs as largely responsible for higher R&D and prescription drug costs. The Bain study included 12 months of sales and marketing costs incurred in launching a new drug.

Dr. Goldrich also keeps abreast of a drug’s efficacy and performance, particularly when its patent protection expires and competing firms produce generic equivalents. “For a while Claritin was extremely popular in its class, but when it went OTC [over the counter], the manufacturer stopped promoting it heavily. Now there are new and better drugs,” he said.

This example highlights the complex relationship between drug R&D, patent protection, and the cost of patients’ medications. Schering-Plough got its money’s worth from Claritin, according to Marcia Angell, MD, in her 2004 book, The Truth about Drug Companies (Random House, 2004): before the blockbuster drug’s patent expired, the firm raised Claritin’s price 13 times in five years, a 50% cumulative increase.

When a drug such as Claritin loses patent exclusivity and becomes available without a prescription, physicians and patients face a dilemma. Use the same formulation, now OTC, and face higher out of pocket costs because the drug is no longer a covered prescription drug? Switch to a generic equivalent with a low co-pay? Choose a newer drug that may be more effective and more expensive?

Drug R&D and Drug Prices

Another pertinent question in the drug R&D cost debate is development time. Are new drugs getting to market more quickly and cost-effectively than in the past?

The pharmaceutical industry argues that the long R&D process drives high drug prices. However, Salomeh Keyhani, MD, and colleagues found that clinical trial periods have not increased between 1992 and 2002, and that regulatory review times actually decreased during that period in their review of development times for 168 NMEs (Are Development Times for Pharmaceuticals Increasing or Decreasing? Health Affairs 2006; 25(2); 461–468).

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Medical Education, Practice Management Tagged With: cost, finance, healthcare reform, medication, pharmaceuticals, policy, treatmentIssue: July 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Drug Marketing: Different Impacts on Different Physicians
  • Prescription Drug Benefit Primer
  • Rising Drug Costs Create Concern About Drug Diversions
  • AMA’s Opt-Out Provision for Sale of Physician Prescribing Data Seen as First Step

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939