• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

What Otolaryngologists Need to Know About Working with Patients as Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids Become Available

by Jennifer Fink • April 18, 2022

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The proposed rules have generated discussion and concern among otolaryngologists and audiologists. “Human beings are very poor judges of their own level of hearing loss,” Dr. Grisel said. “Thus, patients with severe or profound loss may initially seek treatment with an OTC aid.”

You Might Also Like

  • What Otolaryngologists Need to Know About OTC Hearing Aids
  • FDA Works to Increase Consumer Access to Hearing Aids
  • Smartphone-Linked Hearing Aids Empower Hearing Impaired Patients
  • Do Hearing Aids Help Prevent Cognitive Decline?
Explore This Issue
April 2022

Additionally, an individual whose hearing falls within the normal range may perceive mild or moderate hearing loss, purchase and use an OTC hearing aid, and potentially damage their hearing, especially given the lack of a gain limit, Dr. Grisel said, noting that exposure to 120 dB of sound can cause noise-induced hearing loss in just 28 seconds. 

The FDA has defended the 120 dB limit on the grounds that 28 seconds gives the user enough time to act before sustaining injury. The Hearing Industries Association (HIA) and American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery have both urged the FDA to limit output to 110 dB and gain to 25 dB, however. 

“The only thing standing between a patient and noise-induced hearing loss is their own perception that there’s a problem and the ability to take it out of their ears,” Dr. Grisel said. “This is problematic given that the hearing aid population tends to have higher levels of cognitive decline and dexterity problems. If these devices are intended for mild to moderate levels of hearing loss, why would you ever need more gain than 25 dB?” 

The otolaryngology community wants people to have easy access to hearing treatment, Dr. Grisel said. “But our concerns are, is this going to be done safely? Are patients with more severe hearing health problems going to miss out on medical treatment? Is the technology safe? Are these products going to achieve their intended goals?”

There is a risk that inappropriately used OTC hearing aids may lead some people to doubt the efficacy of hearing aids and other hearing devices. “If a patient uses an over-the-counter hearing device that doesn’t fit their hearing profile, it might actually make it more difficult for them to hear,” said Doug Backous, MD, a neurotologist with Puget Sound ENT Proliance Surgeons in Washington state. “You’re using a fixed solution for a dynamic problem, which may not help everyone.” 

People who have severe hearing loss and try an OTC device may be disappointed in their results, which, paradoxically, may drive them further from care. “There’s already a perception that hearing loss isn’t treatable, and failed attempts with an OTC hearing aid may discourage people from a professional audiological and otological evaluation and management,” Dr. Moody said. 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: Hearing aids, patient careIssue: April 2022

You Might Also Like:

  • What Otolaryngologists Need to Know About OTC Hearing Aids
  • FDA Works to Increase Consumer Access to Hearing Aids
  • Smartphone-Linked Hearing Aids Empower Hearing Impaired Patients
  • Do Hearing Aids Help Prevent Cognitive Decline?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Gap Year for Research: Is It Worth It?
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • MRI Surveillance Should Extend to 10 Years Post- Op for Vestibular Schwannoma Patients
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939