• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

What Otolaryngologists Need to Know about Biologics and Allergic Rhinitis

by Jennifer Fink • September 16, 2022

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Future uses of biologics in otolaryngology may include:

You Might Also Like

  • SCIT Effective for Asthma, Allergic Rhinitis
  • Local Nasal Immunotherapy Safe, Effective for Allergic Rhinitis
  • Immunotherapy Benefits for Treating Allergic Rhinitis
  • Former AAOA Heads Take on Allergic Rhinitis
Explore This Issue
September 2022

Chronic rhinosinusitis without polyps. To date, biologic agents have not been extensively studied in patients with CRS without polyposis, and available research suggests that most cases of CRS without polyps are not driven by Th-2 type immune response (Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2021; 54: 709–716); however, approximately 20% to 30% of patients without nasal polyps have an almost identical immunological profile as those with polyps, said Mohamad Chaaban, MD, MSCR, MBA, associate professor at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio. These patients have elevated IF-5 and IF-13 levels, so theoretically, they may benefit from biologics that target those pathways.

Food allergies. More than 70% of individuals with pollen allergy also experience oral allergy syndrome (OAS), or negative reactions to specific foods that may include angioedema of the lips, mouth, and throat (J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022; 149:189-199). As evidence accumulates that biologics may decrease nasal allergy symptoms and increase tolerance of pollens, researchers are sure to investigate the potential utility of biologics to treat food allergy. At least one study has already found that a patient with a birch allergy and OAS was able to eat apples for several weeks after treatment with a novel antibody cocktail targeting Bet v-1 (J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022;149:189-199). “That’s very exciting and shows how biologics may eventually be used as a preventive for food allergies,” Dr. Chaaban added.

 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider, Practice Focus, Rhinology Tagged With: biologics, rhinosinusitis, treatmentIssue: September 2022

You Might Also Like:

  • SCIT Effective for Asthma, Allergic Rhinitis
  • Local Nasal Immunotherapy Safe, Effective for Allergic Rhinitis
  • Immunotherapy Benefits for Treating Allergic Rhinitis
  • Former AAOA Heads Take on Allergic Rhinitis

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you experienced an increase in in-office rhinology procedures in the last year?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • History of the Cochlear Implant

    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • ChatGPT-Generated “Fake” References in Academic Manuscripts Is a Problem 

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Questions on NIH Funding Leave ENT Researchers Pondering Next Steps and Leaving Everything Up in the Air
    • In-Office Rhinology Practices Continue to Grow
    • How Do We Define “Winning” in the OR?
    • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
    • How To: Superior Maximization of Sphenoidotomy with Olfaction Preservation in Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939