• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Tonsillectomy Specimen Analysis Not Cost Effective

by Ravindhra G. Elluru, MD, PhD • December 9, 2011

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Is pathological evaluation of routine pediatric tonsillectomy specimens necessary?

Background: Although adenotonsillectomy for hypertrophic tonsils and adenoids or chronic tonsillitis remains one of the most common procedures performed in the U.S., there is still no uniform consensus on the management of the surgical specimens. There seems, however, to be a decreasing trend over the last few years of performing microscopic or gross examination on tonsil specimens after routine tonsillectomy. To date, there has been no data on the cost-effectiveness of the different options for handling tonsillectomy specimens.

You Might Also Like

  • CT Neck Scans Are Cost-Effective Diagnostic Tools for UVFP
  • Endoscopic Management More Cost Effective than Tracheostomy for BVFP
  • Endoscopic Sinus Surgery More Cost-Effective than Dupilumab in Treatment of Patients with Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps
  • Limited Histopathology Adequate for Evaluating Routine Cholesteatoma Cases
Explore This Issue
December 2011

Study design: Retrospective case series.

Setting: Tertiary care children’s hospital.

Synopsis: Researchers reviewed the charts of 5,235 pediatric patients who underwent a tonsillectomy between January 1998 and December 2008, then evaluated the results of pathological evaluation of routine and non-routine specimens. According to the protocol active during this period, specimens from tonsillectomy were sent for gross examination (routine) unless specific indications (non-routine) for microscopic analysis existed. These specific indications included age older than 18 years, suspicion of malignancy, asymmetry of tonsil size, mass, history of hematolymphoid neoplasm or a history of transplantation.

Of the 5,235 tonsillectomy specimens, 4,169 underwent gross pathologic analysis only, while 1,066 underwent microscopic analysis. No pathological abnormalities were identified in the gross-only specimens. Seventeen specimens that were found to be suspicious on gross exam had no pathology after microscopic exam. Positive pathological findings on microscopic analysis were only identified in post-transplant patients and in cases of surgeon suspicion. These results are congruent with previous reports.

Bottom line: There is very low prevalence of unsuspected pathology on gross pathological analysis of routine tonsillectomy specimens. Therefore, microscopic analysis of routine tonsillectomy specimens is not cost effective.

Citation: Nelson ME, Gernon, TJ, Taylor JC, et al. Pathologic evaluation of routine pediatric tonsillectomy specimens: analysis of cost-effectiveness. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144(5):778-783.

—Reviewed by Ravindhra G. Elluru, MD, PhD

Filed Under: Laryngology, Literature Reviews Tagged With: cost effective, microscopic analysis, pathological evaluation, tonsillectomy specimensIssue: December 2011

You Might Also Like:

  • CT Neck Scans Are Cost-Effective Diagnostic Tools for UVFP
  • Endoscopic Management More Cost Effective than Tracheostomy for BVFP
  • Endoscopic Sinus Surgery More Cost-Effective than Dupilumab in Treatment of Patients with Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps
  • Limited Histopathology Adequate for Evaluating Routine Cholesteatoma Cases

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you experienced an increase in in-office rhinology procedures in the last year?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • History of the Cochlear Implant

    • ChatGPT-Generated “Fake” References in Academic Manuscripts Is a Problem 

    • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Questions on NIH Funding Leave ENT Researchers Pondering Next Steps and Leaving Everything Up in the Air
    • In-Office Rhinology Practices Continue to Grow
    • How Do We Define “Winning” in the OR?
    • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
    • How To: Superior Maximization of Sphenoidotomy with Olfaction Preservation in Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939