• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

The Mechanisms of Tinnitus: Research Progress and Treatment Implications

by Andrea M. Sattinger • December 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Therapies for tinnitus currently can be categorized as pharmacologic, behavioral, acoustic-physical, and combinations of the above.

You Might Also Like

  • Tinnitus Research Implicates Brain Structures in Hearing Disorder
  • Electrical Stimulation to Treat Tinnitus
  • Congress Mandates Better Reporting of Tinnitus Among United States Military
  • NIH Launches Clinical Study for Tinnitus Treatment
Explore This Issue
December 2008

Pharmaceuticals are a first-line therapy followed by instrumentation. Drugs used in tinnitus largely target the depression and anxiety that accompany the disorder. Agents used to varying extents include antidepressants, anticonvulsants, antihistamines, dexchlorpheniramine, antiarrhythmics, anesthetics, and the rheologic agent pentoxifylline. The tinnitus itself is usually not reduced or eliminated by the pharmacologic agents, but the effects seem to attenuate the patient’s annoyance. In a select cohort of patients with subjective idiopathic tinnitus (SIT) of central-type severe disabling tinnitus, gabapentin demonstrated safe and effective relief, but this is controversial. Although developing test drugs to reverse neuronal changes-those of neural activity, neural synchrony, and frequency map reorganization-is an obvious direction for exploration, the problem to date is that blocking activity in the auditory system is difficult to achieve without also blocking activity in other vital brain areas.

Psychological counseling is beneficial for a number of reasons. First, it may be used to reorient associations the individual has with the tinnitus signal such that a negative effect can be alleviated to a more neutral response, similar to the way patients are taught to manage chronic pain. Combining counseling, sound therapy (partial masking), and education can be highly effective in neutralizing a patient’s emotional reactions to tinnitus percepts.

Patients are sometimes counseled to avoid tinnitus-causing agents (such as salicylates). Some groups suggest that patients try a step-and dose-wise exploration of alternative therapies, including acupuncture, hypnotherapy, vitamins, and herbs such as gingko biloba extract.

Acoustic therapies (instrumentation) aim at masking or partially masking the tinnitus, or influencing the way the central nervous system works. Instrumentation has advanced for tinnitus patients who have near-normal hearing, mild high-frequency hearing losses, hyperacusis, and high-frequency tinnitus. Effective therapies include masking devices, hearing aids (for those with higher-level hearing loss), and acoustic (filtered music) therapy. If the aforementioned neural changes (increased activity, synchrony, and frequency-map reorganization) are triggered by damage to the inner ear or by hearing loss (regeneration from selectively damaged outer hair cells appears to be a root cause), stimulating the auditory system in a way that better restores activity to the damaged area may have the effect of reversing the plasticity. Instead of neurons remaining hyperactive, oversynchronized, or overselective to certain frequencies, directly stimulating the ear with frequencies that span the frequency range of the hearing loss might diminish those measures of change. In animal studies testing this hypothesis, data seemed to suggest that, in fact, that is what happens: In those with less than severe hearing loss, who have a high-pitched or high-frequency hearing loss similar to the tinnitus, and who still have residual function, stimulation of functional areas demonstrates that all three measures of change are diminished.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: medication, Otology, research, tinnitus, treatmentIssue: December 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Tinnitus Research Implicates Brain Structures in Hearing Disorder
  • Electrical Stimulation to Treat Tinnitus
  • Congress Mandates Better Reporting of Tinnitus Among United States Military
  • NIH Launches Clinical Study for Tinnitus Treatment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939