• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Risks of Pharyngeal Pack Use Following FESS Outweigh Benefits

by Amy E. Hamaker • November 9, 2017

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Do pharyngeal packs have an effect on postoperative pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting in functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS)?

Bottom line
There was no significant difference in mean throat pain at four hours following surgery or level of nausea at four hours and 24 hours after surgery; the difference in pain levels at 24 hours after surgery may be explained by other phenomena. The authors advise against using the packs due to potential risks.

You Might Also Like

  • Tasks Required for a Correct Training Approach to FESS
  • Hierarchical Task Analysis Can Help Reduce Error in FESS
  • Risks and Benefits of CT Scans in Children
  • Maximizing Results and Minimizing Complications during FESS
Explore This Issue
November 2017

Background: It is thought that pharyngeal packs prevent cartilage and bony debris aspiration and blood product ingestion during FESS, thereby decreasing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Studies have failed to show this connection adequately, and the pharyngeal packs can increase some complications, including postoperative throat pain and aphthous stomatitis.

Study design: Powered, double-blinded randomized control trial of 46 patients scheduled for routine endoscopic sinus surgery, randomly allocated to pharyngeal packing and control groups.

Setting: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City.

Synopsis: The mean and median throat pain at four hours following surgery were 1.73 and 0.0, respectively. There were no significant differences in the mean throat pain across either group at four hours following surgery. The mean and median throat pain at 24 hours following surgery were 1.12 and 0.0, respectively. However, patients without pharyngeal packing experienced more pain than those who had a throat pack placed, with a mean difference of 1.5. Of the 45 patients who were captured with the four-hour nausea and vomiting survey, 39 denied any nausea, while three, two, and one complained of mild, moderate, and severe nausea, respectively. Pharyngeal packing presence or absence did not appear to influence the level of nausea experienced within four hours of surgery. Only four patients, three receiving pharyngeal packs and one in the control group, reported one or more vomiting episodes at any point within 24 hours of their surgery. Limitations included the fact that no record was kept of the amount of narcotics used by patients postoperatively or whether the throat was suctioned with an orogastric tube.

Citation: Green R, Konuthula N, Sobrero M, et al. Use of pharyngeal packs in functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Laryngoscope. 2017;127: 2460–2465.

Filed Under: Allergy, Literature Reviews Tagged With: clinical best practices, FESS, functional endoscopic sinus surgery, pharyngeal pack, postoperative nausea, postoperative pain, risks, surgeryIssue: November 2017

You Might Also Like:

  • Tasks Required for a Correct Training Approach to FESS
  • Hierarchical Task Analysis Can Help Reduce Error in FESS
  • Risks and Benefits of CT Scans in Children
  • Maximizing Results and Minimizing Complications during FESS

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use AI-powered scribes for documentation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • How to: Positioning for Middle Cranial Fossa Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • The Importance of Time Away
    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 
    • Reflections from a Past President of the Triological Society
    • ENT Surgeons Explore the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Powered Scribes: Revolutionizing Documentation in Healthcare
    • How To: Open Expansion Laryngoplasty for Combined Glottic and Subglottic Stenosis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939