• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

PET-Directed Management of Node-Positive Head and Neck Cancers

by Jonas Johnson, MD • September 17, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Is neck dissection required routinely in the management of node-positive head and neck squamous cancer after definitive radiation therapy or chemoradiation therapy?

Background: Non-operative therapy is frequently employed in the management of patients with advanced cancer of the larynx and oropharynx. However, these patients commonly have bulky adenopathy. Some surgeons believe routine neck dissection after completion of radiation (R) or chemoradiation (CR) is essential. Others believe that only residual adenopathy requires neck dissection.

You Might Also Like

  • PET Not Ready for Routine Management of Head and Neck Cancer
  • PET/CT Useful for Head and Neck Cancers, with Limitations
  • Is Radiation, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, or Neck Dissection Beneficial for the Node Negative Neck in Merkel Cell Carcinoma?
  • Survival for Advanced Head, Neck Cancer Improvements May Be Related to PET
Explore This Issue
March 2012

Study design: Consecutive patients who achieved complete response at the primary site after R or CR underwent PET/CT 12 weeks after treatment. Patients with equivocal PET underwent a repeat PET four to six weeks later. Patients deemed PET negative were uniformly observed regardless of residual nodal size. These data were collected prospectively in a cohort of patients having treatment with CR or R.

Setting: University-affiliated cancer centers in Brisbane, Australia.

Synopsis: A total of 112 patients with node-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were available for study. Residual CT nodal abnormalities were present in 50 patients (45 percent). PET was negative in 41 of these 50 patients, while PET was positive in nine patients. None of the patients with PET-negative nodal abnormality developed failure in the neck. Patients with PET-positive residual disease underwent neck dissection.

Bottom line: PET and CT can be used to restage patients following definitive R or CR therapy. Neck dissection can be safety reserved only for patients with persistent PET-positive scans.

Reference: Porceddu SV, Pryor DI, Burmeister E, et al. Results of a prospective study of positron emission tomography-directed management of residual nodal abnormalities in node-positive head and neck cancer after definitive radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy. Head Neck. 2011;33(12):1675-1682.

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Head and Neck, Literature Reviews, Practice Focus Tagged With: cancerIssue: March 2012

You Might Also Like:

  • PET Not Ready for Routine Management of Head and Neck Cancer
  • PET/CT Useful for Head and Neck Cancers, with Limitations
  • Is Radiation, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, or Neck Dissection Beneficial for the Node Negative Neck in Merkel Cell Carcinoma?
  • Survival for Advanced Head, Neck Cancer Improvements May Be Related to PET

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use TXA to reduce intraoperative and post-op bleeding?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer

    • Call for Resident Bowl Questions

    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • Ethical Obligations and Duty to Advocate for Patients in Prior Authorization for Surgery

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Growing Use of Tranexamic Acid in Otolaryngology
    • Reconnect, Recharge, Relax, and Choose Joy This Season
    • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
    • Faculty Mentorship of Academic Surgeons
    • CMS’ New Rule Aims to Streamline the Prior Authorization Process

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939