• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Options for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Palate Surgery Reviewed

by Thomas R. Collins • November 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The lateral pharyngoplasty procedure enlarges the pharyngeal airway by cutting the superior constrictor muscle and mobilizing, dividing and relocating the palatopharyngeus muscle. The survival of the palatopharyngeus flap and preserving the soft palate and uvula to avoid velopharyngeal insufficiency are key to success in this procedure, said Michel Cahali, MD, PhD, an otorhinolaryngologist at the University of São Paolo in Brazil. When the procedure fails, it’s usually because there has been only lateral enlargement of the space, a lack of mobility or division of the palatopharyngeus or bilateral necrosis of the palatopharyngeus flap, he said.

You Might Also Like

  • Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: One Size Doesn’t Fit All
  • Gaps in the Knowledge Base Regarding Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • Patient Outcomes Can Measure Success of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Surgery
  • Transoral Robotic Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Results in Significant Changes
Explore This Issue
November 2013

Z-palatoplasty: Michael Friedman, MD, chairman of otolaryngology at Rush University Medical Center in Chicago, developed Z-palatoplasty (ZPP) as an option in patients for whom UPPP has failed. The procedure is designed to create an anterolateral direction of scar contracture that opens the airway as healing occurs. Objective success rates are much higher for ZPP than UPPP, at 68 percent and 28 percent, respectively (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;131:89-100).

“Since the procedure involves considerable morbidity, it should be considered only for very select patients with severe disease who are not candidates for alternative therapy,” Dr. Friedman said in his presentation. “Selected patients who proceed with the procedure are likely to have subjective and objective improvement, with a reasonable chance for ‘cure.’”

Palatal advancement: In palatal advancement, a section of the hard palate is removed to make more space at the back of the pharynx. The soft palate is then moved forward and re-attached. This enlarges the space and gives more tension to the soft palate to help avoid collapse.

Indications for the procedure are retropalatal stenosis or scarring, failure of the UPPP with persistent narrowing and proximal pharyngeal narrowing, said B. Tucker Woodson, MD, chief of the division of sleep medicine and professor of otolaryngology at the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee. Patients are not candidates if there’s a concern about compromised palatal blood supply, if they’re are unable to tolerate an oral splint, if they have poor lateral wall movement, if they have impaired swallowing or speech or if they have maxillofacial surgery planned.

Soft-palate implants: These implants are not a good treatment for sleep apnea but can work well in snoring for patients with palate flutter and realistic expectations, said Brian Rotenberg, MD, MPH, director of the sleep surgery program at Western University in London, Ontario, Canada. The implants are contraindicated for smokers, obese patients, those with an AHI over 15, those with symptomatic OSA and a tonsil size two or greater. Studies have shown minimal improvements in AHI scores (approximately three to four points difference before and after the surgery) and extrusion rates of 2 to 4 percent. Often, there’s early improvement, followed by some clinical decline over time, so patients should be counseled about expectations.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Practice Focus, Sleep Medicine Tagged With: AAO-HNS annual meeting, Obstructive sleep apnea, palate surgery, pharyngoplasty, uvulopalatopharyngoplasty, Z-palatoplastyIssue: November 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: One Size Doesn’t Fit All
  • Gaps in the Knowledge Base Regarding Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • Patient Outcomes Can Measure Success of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Surgery
  • Transoral Robotic Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Results in Significant Changes

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • 22 Symptoms Common to Patients with Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939