• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

In-Office KTP or PDL Treatment of VF Leukoplakia Effective for Disease Control

by Literature Reviews • July 11, 2017

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Is serial in-office laser treatment for vocal fold (VF) leukoplakia effective for long-term disease control with minimal morbidity?

Bottom line
Serial outpatient potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) or pulsed dye laser (PDL) treatment of VF leukoplakia is effective for disease control with minimal morbidity and preservation of voice quality.

You Might Also Like

  • Vocal Cord Leukoplakia Management Trends Include Advanced Surgical Techniques, Voice Preservation
  • Novel Method Overcomes Nasal Discomfort in Office-Based Laser Surgery
  • When Is Surgical Intervention Indicated for Vocal Fold Leukoplakia?
  • Serial Excision Does Not Reduce Vocal Fold Laryngeal Dysplasia Grade
Explore This Issue
July 2017

Background: Leukoplakia is a clinical diagnosis indicating the presence of keratin on the VF epithelial surface. This diagnosis portends a risk of malignant transformation, with the severity of dysplasia associated with an increased rate of malignant degeneration. The management of leukoplakia poses a clinical dilemma because leukoplakia carries with it a risk of malignant transformation regardless of dysplasia grade, and it often recurs after treatment. There is no consensus on treatment, with surgeons offering varying degrees and frequency of surveillance, differing thresholds for repeat biopsy, and options of repetitive ablative or excisional management. Recently, treatment with in-office laser has become a common strategy. Although there are studies demonstrating the efficacy of in-office laser treatment of VF leukoplakia, these works are often based on a small series that may not be specific to leukoplakia, do not employ serial treatment, have short-term follow-up, and do not use objective methods to quantify disease regression (See Figure 2).

Figure 2. Determination of % lesion regression. (A) Average lesion area (three measurements) = 1,831 pixels. (B) Average full VF area (three measurements) = 6,924 pixels. Percent VF covered by the lesion was determined by (A/B) × 100% = (1,831/6,924) × 100% = 26.4% of the VF covered by lesion. This % was then compared with the postoperative picture % to determine regression. Credit: Copyright 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Figure 2. Determination of % lesion regression. (A) Average lesion area (three measurements) = 1,831 pixels. (B) Average full VF area (three measurements) = 6,924 pixels. Percent VF covered by the lesion was determined by (A/B) × 100% = (1,831/6,924) × 100% = 26.4% of the VF covered by lesion. This % was then compared with the postoperative picture % to determine regression.
Credit: Copyright 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Study design: Retrospective review (2008–2015).

Setting: New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai.

Synopsis: Forty-six patients with VF leukoplakia treated by in-office KTP or PDL were included. Median follow-up from final laser treatment was 19.6 months. Main outcomes included: 1) rate of disease control, 2) percentage of disease regression using ImageJ analysis. Secondary outcomes included vocal assessment using the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10). Patients underwent a median of two (range: 1–6) in-office laser treatments. Time between treatments was median 7.6 months. After final treatment, 19 patients (41.3%) had no disease; two patients (4.3%) progressed to invasive cancer; overall disease regression was median 77.1%; and VHI-10 score decreased by median 5. Thirty-one patients (67.4%) were responders (controlled with in-office treatment only); 13 patients (28.3%) who required operative intervention and two patients (4%) who underwent radiation were categorized as failures. Compared with responders, failures demonstrated significantly shorter duration between treatments (median 2.3 vs. 8.9 months) and significantly less regression (median 49.3% vs. 100%).

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Laryngology, Literature Reviews Tagged With: laser treatment, outcome, pulsed dye laser, treatment, VF leukoplakia, vocal fold leukoplakiaIssue: July 2017

You Might Also Like:

  • Vocal Cord Leukoplakia Management Trends Include Advanced Surgical Techniques, Voice Preservation
  • Novel Method Overcomes Nasal Discomfort in Office-Based Laser Surgery
  • When Is Surgical Intervention Indicated for Vocal Fold Leukoplakia?
  • Serial Excision Does Not Reduce Vocal Fold Laryngeal Dysplasia Grade

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you served as an expert witness in a case that’s gone to trial?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer

    • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
    • Composition and Priorities of Multidisciplinary Pediatric Thyroid Programs: A Consensus Statement
    • Artificial Intelligence as Author: Can Scientific Reviewers Recognize GPT- 4o–Generated Manuscripts?
    • Self-Administered Taste Testing Without Water: Normative Data for the 53-Item WETT
    • Long-Term Particulate Matter Exposure May Increase Risk of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis: Results from an Exposure-Matched Study

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939