• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

New Medicaid Changes in West Virginia and Kentucky May Affect Otolaryngology Practice

by Alice Goodman • September 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Kentucky has imposed limits on prescription drugs and on physical and speech therapy. Children are allowed 15 visits to the speech therapist each year. If more visits are necessary, then they can get authorization from the program, Dr. Badgett said. Adult patients are authorized for 10 visits to the speech therapist per year. Stroke victims and other elderly people are allowed 30 visits to the speech therapist each year. The prescription benefits entail modest co-pays, he continued, and most children and families will have no co-pays.

You Might Also Like

  • New Ways to Deliver Care: The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation promises cost-cutting ideas
  • Geographic Area, Years in Practice, Gender Affect Otolaryngology Opioid Prescribing
  • What If They Gave Universal Coverage and No Doctors Came?
  • Reimbursement and Outcome Measurement in Otolaryngology Practices: What the Government Can Do to You and for You
Explore This Issue
September 2006

The redesign incorporates moderate restrictions. We tried not to make draconian changes. Before, there were no limits. Now we have 5-percent coinsurance on non-emergency ER use. We’ve had no outcry from physicians. They just want to know what the changes will be, Dr. Badgett said.

Criticism of Kentucky’s New Plan

Daniel Mongiardo, MD, who is an otolaryngologist and state senator in Kentucky, is not optimistic about the new plan. He said that neither the state nor the federal government can afford the huge health-care expenditures under the current system, so the state has resorted to a bag of tricks that shifts the costs onto patients who cannot afford it either.

Dr. Mongiardo predicted that patients will not get necessary services under the new plan, and he foresees serious problems. He said the new plan increases the co-pay for admission to the hospital to $50 and that many Medicaid beneficiaries cannot afford $50 and will not go to the hospital when necessary. We will see sicker and sicker patients and tragic outcomes, he said. When hospitals can no longer afford to take care of patients, quality of care suffers. We will also see more lawsuits.

Focusing on the limits for speech therapy, Dr. Mongiardo said that best practice is to have children see a speech therapist weekly until improvement is noted. In school, some children get speech therapy on a daily basis.

The bottom line is our system is broken. Health care is the only industry that has not undergone a major overhaul in recent years. There are multiple inefficiencies that need to be addressed. Information flow has to be computerized with a centralized access. To take money out of this broken system is only going to make things worse, he stated.

Dr. Mongiardo said that experience shows that managed care approaches do not fix the system. Things have only gotten worse under managed care. Politicians and bureaucrats think the same way, he commented. The approaches planned by West Virginia and Kentucky are tired approaches, he feels; he believes that a fresh perspective is necessary.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Practice Management Tagged With: healthcare reform, Medicare, outcomes, policy, reimbursement, spendingIssue: September 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • New Ways to Deliver Care: The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation promises cost-cutting ideas
  • Geographic Area, Years in Practice, Gender Affect Otolaryngology Opioid Prescribing
  • What If They Gave Universal Coverage and No Doctors Came?
  • Reimbursement and Outcome Measurement in Otolaryngology Practices: What the Government Can Do to You and for You

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use AI-powered scribes for documentation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • How to: Positioning for Middle Cranial Fossa Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • The Importance of Time Away
    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 
    • Reflections from a Past President of the Triological Society
    • ENT Surgeons Explore the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Powered Scribes: Revolutionizing Documentation in Healthcare
    • How To: Open Expansion Laryngoplasty for Combined Glottic and Subglottic Stenosis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939