• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Middle Ear Implants Offer Potential: New breed of devices may stimulate compliance, experts say

by David H. Kirkwood • April 27, 2011

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

When the fully implantable Otologics Carina reaches the American market, CEO Bedoya estimated it will cost about $15,000, based on the company’s experience in Europe. Currently, implantation takes about 90 minutes, but the goal is to reduce this time to an hour.

You Might Also Like

  • Device Offers Effective Alternative to Middle Ear Surgery, Hearing Aids
  • Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids Offer Viable Alternative to Standard Devices
  • Firearm Muzzle Suppressors Far Superior to Ear-Level Protection Devices for Noise Reduction
  • Choice of Ear for Cochlear Implantation: Implant the Better- or Worse-Hearing Ear?
Explore This Issue
May 2011

MED-EL does not publish an estimated price for its Vibrant Soundbridge, in part, Franz said, because the cost of the surgery depends on the hospital. However, she said, Soundbridge is “in the same ballpark” as other MEIs and “much more expensive than a hearing aid.” Typically, the price of a pair of high-end hearing aids falls in the range of $5,000-$6,000.

As for the surgery, MED-EL provides some support training, but, Franz added, “It’s not a big stretch from what otologists already do. It’s similar to cochlear implant surgery.”

In the end, some of those interviewed believe that reimbursement will determine whether the MEI remains a niche product or goes mainstream. Currently, Medicare and most insurance companies in the U.S. do not cover either the device or the surgery. As a result, said Dr. Green, “The price-to-benefit ratio is outside the range of what most people can afford, so it really limits it to people who are wealthy. With the economy where it is, the average person doesn’t have the disposable income to pay for these.”

However, he added, “If it were covered by insurance, I think you’d have people lined up outside the clinics.”

Other factors may also be at play. One of these, said MED-EL’s Franz, is “lack of awareness that the technology is available.” While she thinks that otologists are generally knowledgeable about the devices, she sees a pressing need to get more information out to consumers and also to audiologists so that they will consider it as an option for their unsuccessful hearing aid patients.

Marshall Chasin, AuD, MSc, has frequently written about middle ear implants. Dr. Chasin, an audiologist who serves as coordinator of research at the Canadian Hearing Society in Toronto, sees a logistical problem standing in the way of maximum use of MEIs. Because of the complementary roles of the surgeon who implants the device and the audiologist who programs it, he noted, “there needs to be a well-defined interaction between the otolaryngologist and the audiologist. However, this is not always the case.”

Some Reservations

Despite the obvious attractions of a totally implantable system, some observers express reservations. Dr. Green noted that the concerns he has about MEIs in general—including their high cost, the possible need for repeated surgical procedures, and the risk of implanting someone whose hearing loss soon becomes too severe to he helped—are even more troubling with totally implantable devices, because the surgery is more complicated. Also, he noted, with the Esteem, replacing the battery requires additional surgery from time to time.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Otology/Neurotology, Special Reports, Tech Talk Tagged With: insurance, Otology, patient complianceIssue: May 2011

You Might Also Like:

  • Device Offers Effective Alternative to Middle Ear Surgery, Hearing Aids
  • Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids Offer Viable Alternative to Standard Devices
  • Firearm Muzzle Suppressors Far Superior to Ear-Level Protection Devices for Noise Reduction
  • Choice of Ear for Cochlear Implantation: Implant the Better- or Worse-Hearing Ear?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • 22 Symptoms Common to Patients with Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939