• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Losing Sleep over Residents’ Work Week Restrictions

by Marlene Piturro, PhD, MBA • March 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Here are the parameters used to structure a non-resident hospitalist program:

You Might Also Like

  • Otolaryngologists View Resident Work-Hour Restrictions: ACS calls for in-depth investigation before mandating further restrictions
  • Resident Restructure: Attendings adjust to new work-hour rules
  • Work Hour Limits for Medical Residents Spur Otolaryngologists to Rethink Patient Handoffs
  • ACGME Revises Cap on Resident Work Hours
Explore This Issue
March 2009
  • Set clear goals based on rigorous data analysis.
  • Decide what patient volume must be removed from average daily census to ensure work hours compliance.
  • Gather data on daily variations and trends on inpatient admissions, and peaks/troughs of admissions times.
  • Examine patient volume under different scenarios: removing a fixed number of patients per day, creating intern-admission caps, alternating admissions between residents and hospitalists.
  • Examine call-reduce or eliminate short-call, change the frequency of long-call, or implement limitations on night admissions to house staff.
  • Ponder patient population for the non-resident service: What percentage of low-complexity, non-teaching cases is appropriate?
  • Set average daily census for senior residents (8-10), attendings (9-11), and physician extenders (4-6).

Source: The Hospitalist, Jan/Feb 2005.

The Global Debacle

Since the 1980s, physicians in training outside the United States have been protected from the long hours that promote continuity of care and exposure to surgical and other technical skill practice. New Zealand caps residents’ weekly hours at 72, France at 52.5, and Denmark at 37. In 2009, European countries are expected to implement a 48-hour work week. Work hour restrictions have already cost the EU 1.75 billion euros ($2.38 billion), and left Britain’s NHS alone short 15,000 physicians. A 2002 survey by the British Orthopedic Association concluded: To become a competent surgeon in one-fifth of the time once needed either requires genius, intensive practice, or lower standards. We are not geniuses.

Sir Bernard Ribeiro, former president of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, an outspoken critic of shorter work hours as a deterrent to producing proficiency in the OR, testified before the recent IOM’s Resident Duty Hours Panel to help the United States avoid the same mistakes. Sir Bernard noted that British surgical residents perform 25% fewer procedures than did their predecessors before duty restrictions set in. The IOM turned a deaf ear, claiming that every system is different, and it’s hard to generalize, according to committee member Dr. Kenneth Ludmerer, Professor of Medicine and History at Washington University in St. Louis.

©2009 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Career Development, Health Policy, Practice Management, Sleep Medicine Issue: March 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Otolaryngologists View Resident Work-Hour Restrictions: ACS calls for in-depth investigation before mandating further restrictions
  • Resident Restructure: Attendings adjust to new work-hour rules
  • Work Hour Limits for Medical Residents Spur Otolaryngologists to Rethink Patient Handoffs
  • ACGME Revises Cap on Resident Work Hours

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Gap Year for Research: Is It Worth It?
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes
    • MRI Surveillance Should Extend to 10 Years Post- Op for Vestibular Schwannoma Patients
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939