• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

MRIs Not Cost Effective for Evaluating Idiopathic Olfactory Loss

by Amy Eckner • February 5, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

How cost effective is the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for evaluating patients with idiopathic olfactory loss?

Background: Olfactory disorders have many etiologies, including post-upper respiratory illness, trauma, toxic exposures, obstruction and congenital issues, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, and Alzheimer’s disease. Often, the etiology remains unknown even after extensive testing. Increasing healthcare costs make it important to critically analyze expensive diagnostic techniques such as MRI.

You Might Also Like

  • Evaluating Abnormal MRI in Asymmetric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • Hippocampal Volume Shown on MRI Correlates with Olfactory Performance in Patients with Cognitive Impairment
  • MRI Is Cost-Effective for Diagnosing Asymmetric SNHL
  • MRI, CT Beneficial for Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Explore This Issue
February 2014

Study design: Retrospective chart review of 839 patients at a tertiary center from July 1998 through October 2011.

Setting: University of Cincinnati Neurosensory Disorders Center.

Synopsis: Data from radiologists’ interpretations of brain MRIs were used, and abnormal MRI findings were then classified as either incidental or potentially responsible for olfactory disorders. Cost analysis was based on an average hospital charge of $2,500. Of 839 patients, 247 were identified as presenting with presumed idiopathic olfactory loss. Brain MRI data were available for 130 of those patients; a total of 4.6% of these MRIs were considered abnormal, with hypertensive encephalopathy, left frontal lobe vascular malformation, right third ventricle mass, left olfactory bulb atrophy, possible left posterior fossa schwannoma, and multiple white matter abnormalities suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS) presenting in one patient each. Only the MRI suggestive of MS was considered potentially causative. The estimated charge per abnormality was approximately $54,250, while the estimated charge per MRI finding thought to be responsible for olfactory loss was $325,000. There were some limitations, including a lack of standardization in diagnostic evaluations, a lack of MRI testing in all idiopathic patients, and possible selection bias in terms of patient recommendation to the center.

Bottom line: The routine use of MRI in patients presenting with isolated idiopathic olfactory loss may be unwarranted, because the diagnostic yield of the brain MRIs was low.

Citation: Hoekman PK, Houlton JJ, Seiden AM. The utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic evaluation of idiopathic olfactory loss. Laryngoscope. 2014:124:365-368.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Practice Focus, Rhinology, Rhinology Tagged With: MRI, rhinologyIssue: February 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • Evaluating Abnormal MRI in Asymmetric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • Hippocampal Volume Shown on MRI Correlates with Olfactory Performance in Patients with Cognitive Impairment
  • MRI Is Cost-Effective for Diagnosing Asymmetric SNHL
  • MRI, CT Beneficial for Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939