• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies

September 6, 2012

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Bottom line: Children with UHL demonstrated improvement in language scores and verbal IQ over time but not in test scores or school performance.

You Might Also Like

  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
Explore This Issue
September 2012

Reference: Lieu JEC, Tye-Murray N, Fu Q. Longitudinal study of children with unilateral hearing loss. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(9):2088-2095.

—Reviewed by Sue Pondrom

Vitamin A Not an Effective Treatment for Olfactory Disorders

Is vitamin A an effective treatment for post-infectious and post-traumatic smell disorders?

Background: Olfactory dysfunction, involving a decreased or absent sense of smell, has been associated with diseases such as viral infections of the upper respiratory tract, chronic rhinosinusitis and head injuries. Only a few studies have looked at the use of prednisolone or intensive stimulation of the olfactory system as treatments. Vitamin A was chosen for this study for its potential to stimulate regeneration and repair of the peripheral olfactory system.

Study design: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Setting: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Dresden Medical School, Germany.

Synopsis: In 52 patients ages 20 to 70, the authors utilized the Sniffin’ Sticks test kit to measure odor thresholds, odor discrimination and odor identification (TDI scores). Vitamin A was prescribed at a dose of 10,000 for three months and follow-up testing was performed, on average, five months after the first investigation. Overall, 44 percent of all patients reported an improvement in olfactory function. There was no significant difference between placebo and vitamin A groups in TDI scores. Etiology (post-infectious or post-traumatic) had no influence on the TDI change between groups. The authors noted that a previous study by Duncan and Briggs showed an improvement in olfactory function, with dosages at 50,000 to 150,000 IU per day. The authors of this study said they could not rule out that a higher dosage of vitamin A may have a beneficial effect, but they worried about the possible side effects.

Bottom line: The applied dosage and duration of vitamin A in this study cannot be recommended in the treatment of post-infectious and post-traumatic olfactory dysfunction.

Reference: Reden J, Lill K, Zahnert T, Haehner A, Hummel T. Olfactory function in patients with postinfectious and posttraumatic smell disorders before and after treatment with vitamin A: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(9):1906-1909.

—Reviewed by Sue Pondrom

ECD as Alternative Surgery for Benign Parotid Tumors

Is extracapsular dissection (ECD) an option for the resection of certain benign parotid tumors, and what are the complication rates and effectiveness of ECD versus superficial parotidectomy (SP)?

Background: ECD differs from classic enucleation, which involves the incision and shelling out of the contents of the tumor capsule. In ECD, the dense parotid fascia overlying the tumor is sharply incised followed by a blunt dissection to the level of the tumor. Under magnified visualization, a loose areolar plane may be seen 2 to 3 mm adjacent to the tumor and is the preferred plane of dissection. Careful dissection continues along the tumor capsule to prevent rupture of the small outpouchings of the tumor that may be encountered. Superficial and/or partial parotidectomy is the gold standard treatment of solitary, benign parotid tumors. SP, with special attention to the removal of the capsule to cure pleomorphic adenomas, is frequently the treatment of choice; ECD is now offered as an alternative method to

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Literature Reviews, Online Exclusives Tagged With: benign parotid tumors, cancer, extracapsular dissection, olfactory disordersIssue: September 2012

You Might Also Like:

  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use AI-powered scribes for documentation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • The Importance of Time Away
    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 
    • Reflections from a Past President of the Triological Society
    • ENT Surgeons Explore the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Powered Scribes: Revolutionizing Documentation in Healthcare
    • How To: Open Expansion Laryngoplasty for Combined Glottic and Subglottic Stenosis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939