• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Is Sialendoscopy an Effective Treatment for Obstructive Salivary Gland Disease?

by Rahmatullah Rahmati, MD, M. Boyd Gillespie, MD, and David W. Eisele, MD • September 7, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Trio Best PracticeBackground

The management of inflammatory salivary gland disease is undergoing a paradigm shift due to the use of sialendoscopy, which facilitates minimally invasive gland-sparing therapeutic procedures. Although salivary gland resection (sialadenectomy) continues to play an important role in the treatment of significant inflammatory salivary gland disorders due to stones, strictures, and chronic sialadenitis, it is not without potential complications including bleeding, infection, nerve injury, sialocele, and cosmetic deformity.

You Might Also Like

  • Sialendoscopy Treatment for Juvenile Recurrent Parotitis Safe, Effective
  • Sialendoscopy: On the Brink of Prime Time in the US?
  • Gland-Preserving Approach to Chronic Sialadienitis Has Successful Outcomes
  • Intraoral Removal Has Advantages over Submandibular Gland Resection
Explore This Issue
September 2014

Sialendoscopy involves miniaturized semirigid endoscopes that allow for the diagnostic evaluation of the salivary ductal system. The working channel of therapeutic endoscopes allows insertion of wire baskets, microforceps, manual drill burrs, laser fibers, and balloons that can be used to address obstructive disorders such as sialoliths and strictures. Additionally, saline irrigation and steroid instillation help to clear cellular debris, salivary sludge, mucous plugs, and generalized ductal inflammation. As such, sialendoscopy offers both diagnostic and therapeutic benefits for obstructive salivary gland disease. This review will evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes of sialendoscopy as a single-treatment modality for obstructive salivary gland disease and also identify factors predictive of treatment success.

Best Practice

Diagnostic sialendoscopy is highly effective in identifying sialolithiasis in obstructive salivary gland disease. Endoscopic findings of round or oval mobile stones <4 to 5 mm generally permit utilization of interventional sialendoscopy in a safe and efficacious, minimally invasive, gland-sparing manner. Large palpable submandibular duct stones or intraglandular stones may be approached with traditional transoral excisional techniques or sialoadenectomy, whereas large intraparotid stones may be managed with sialendoscopy-assisted approaches or usual conservative means. Read the full article in The Laryngoscope.

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Practice Focus, TRIO Best Practices Tagged With: head and neckIssue: September 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • Sialendoscopy Treatment for Juvenile Recurrent Parotitis Safe, Effective
  • Sialendoscopy: On the Brink of Prime Time in the US?
  • Gland-Preserving Approach to Chronic Sialadienitis Has Successful Outcomes
  • Intraoral Removal Has Advantages over Submandibular Gland Resection

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you experienced an increase in in-office rhinology procedures in the last year?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • History of the Cochlear Implant

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Questions on NIH Funding Leave ENT Researchers Pondering Next Steps and Leaving Everything Up in the Air
    • In-Office Rhinology Practices Continue to Grow
    • How Do We Define “Winning” in the OR?
    • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
    • How To: Superior Maximization of Sphenoidotomy with Olfaction Preservation in Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939