• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Innovative Doctors + Better Technology = Practice Changess

by Ed Susman • November 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

When Dr. Carrau and researchers at the University of Pittsburgh began performing the endoscopic procedures, cerebrospinal fluid leaks occurred in about one in four patients. The use of the flap immediately decreased the leak rate to 6 percent, and now it is down to 4 percent.

You Might Also Like

  • Endoscopic Resection of Esthesioneuroblastomas Shows Promising Results
  • Rise of Subspecialties in Pediatric Otolaryngology Has Changed Practice
  • Stereotactic Radiotherapy: A Growing Opportunity for Otolaryngologists: Part 1 of 2
  • More Experience Needed for Endoscopic Resection of Esthesioneuroblastoma
Explore This Issue
November 2008

Of the 39 patients treated by his team, 11 operations involved esthesioneuroblastomas. The rest of the procedures included neuroendocrine tumors, adenocarcinomas, melanomas, and various other tumor types. The follow-up ranged from six to 61 months. Currently, 36 of 39 patients have no evidence of disease; three patients died of disease, at six months, 10 months, and 18 months following surgery.

Combining his data with those from the University of Miami, we have 22 esthesionseuroblastoma patients with a mean follow-up of 31 months. We had one conversion to an open approach and two positive margins. All the patients in the series, ranging from nine to 104 months postsurgery, have no evidence of disease. Three patients experienced cerebrospinal fluid leaks, Dr. Carrau said.

Endoscopy Pros and Cons

Dr. Carrau said that another advantage of the endoscopic approach is that the surgeon has better visualization of the surgical field. With microsurgery, it doesn’t matter how big you magnify it-you will get the same structure, he argued. With the endoscope, you can look around the corners.

In performing endoscopic oral cancer procedures, Dr. Carrau noted jokingly, Our philosophy is that you take bone out until you think it is too much, and then you take some more. It isn’t enough to be able to see; you have to work in the area.

He said that the disadvantages of endoscopic surgery include the fact that there is a steep learning curve, the procedures are instrumentation- and technology-dependent, it has a two-dimensional field of view, and there are some reimbursement issues that need to be solved.

Dr. Carrau said that some people might consider the necessity of requiring two surgeons as another disadvantage. However, I see that as an advantage, not really a disadvantage, he said.

The take-home message is that these cases should be handled as a team surgery; surgeons should be trained in both open and endoscopic techniques. Incremental learning is really a key to this type of procedure, he said.

He advised clinicians interested in performing the procedure using endoscopic approaches to go to courses, do various dissections, and work slowly. Keep yourself within the capabilities of your team, he said. When you move into the lateral skull base, you have to have a lot of experience on your team to handle vascular complications so you don’t have a catastrophe on your hands. Institutional support is also key. You need adjunctive, complementary specialists around you, such as interventional radiologists, who can get you out of trouble.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Head and Neck, Practice Focus, Practice Management, Rhinology, Tech Talk Tagged With: cancer, endoscopic surgery, robotic surgery, surgery, technology, tumorsIssue: November 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Endoscopic Resection of Esthesioneuroblastomas Shows Promising Results
  • Rise of Subspecialties in Pediatric Otolaryngology Has Changed Practice
  • Stereotactic Radiotherapy: A Growing Opportunity for Otolaryngologists: Part 1 of 2
  • More Experience Needed for Endoscopic Resection of Esthesioneuroblastoma

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use AI-powered scribes for documentation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • How to: Positioning for Middle Cranial Fossa Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • The Importance of Time Away
    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 
    • Reflections from a Past President of the Triological Society
    • ENT Surgeons Explore the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Powered Scribes: Revolutionizing Documentation in Healthcare
    • How To: Open Expansion Laryngoplasty for Combined Glottic and Subglottic Stenosis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939