• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

In-Office Transnasal Esophagoscopy Appears Safe, Cost-Effective

by Ed Susman • May 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Cost of Transnasal Esophagoscopy

Steven Zeitels, MD

You Might Also Like

  • Transnasal Esophagoscopy: A Viable Alternative to Conventional Procedures
  • In-Office Transnasal Tracheoesophageal Punctures Yield Good Results
  • Is Esophagoscopy Necessary During Panendoscopy?
  • Novel Method Overcomes Nasal Discomfort in Office-Based Laser Surgery
Explore This Issue
May 2007
Steven Zeitels, MD

In addition to the office treatment outcomes, Dr. Cole reviewed the costs of the procedures. He said that in order to set up the esophagoscopy system the doctors had to outlay $77,655.29 in 2002. That included $40,73.33 for the system and one scope; 19,991.20 for a second scope. A lamp kit cost $1,016.92 and a Steris machine cost $15,905.84, he said.

Dr. Cole said the yearly costs for supplies average about $1350 for the Steris supplies and $650 a year for film paper.

The mean age of patients was 55.4 years, and the average reimbursement was $365.56, with the break-even point for the medical practice at 18 months. These costs were presented in 2002 dollars.

When compared to rigid esophagoscopy, the difference in costs was exceptional. Whereas the cost for the office procedure was about $500 per patient, the cost for the rigid esophagoscopy is about $3,000 per procedure, which included anesthesia and facility fee estimate.

You can see there is a significant cost savings to the industry with transnasal esophagoscopy, Dr. Cole said. If you extrapolate that out to the 371 cases we did, you see that the cumulative costs of the procedures in our practice came to less than $200,000 compared with more than a million dollars that it would have cost the health care system if these cases had been done with rigid esophagoscopy.

Not That Black and White

There is a gray zone that complicates the picture, suggested session moderator Steven Zeitels, MD, the Eugene B. Casey Chair of Laryngeal Surgery at Harvard Medical School in Boston and director of the Center for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation at the Massachusetts General Hospital.Would these patients all be getting rigid esophagoscopies? Or are these patients getting these studies with transnasal esophagoscopy because of the economics? I wonder if you were actually using transnasal esophagoscopy as a screening tool to find the patients who should undergo the more involved, longer rigid procedure.

Dr. Zeitels questioned where the procedure would fit with traditional algorithms of treatment-such as when would a patient be sent for a computer-assisted tomography examination of the transnasal esophagoscopy found something suspicious.

I’m not sure that this is a cost-savings technology because I’m not sure that the people who are getting the transnasal esophagoscopy would be the patients who would be getting rigid esophagoscopy, he said. There is a lot of interest in this.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Clinical, Features Issue: May 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Transnasal Esophagoscopy: A Viable Alternative to Conventional Procedures
  • In-Office Transnasal Tracheoesophageal Punctures Yield Good Results
  • Is Esophagoscopy Necessary During Panendoscopy?
  • Novel Method Overcomes Nasal Discomfort in Office-Based Laser Surgery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939