• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

How to Prevent Medical Diagnostic Errors

by Jill U Adams • September 7, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • AAO-HNS14: Medical Bias Explored As Cause of Medical Errors
  • Few Medical Errors are Reported
  • Admitting Medical Errors Can Help Physicians Learn from Mistakes
  • Small Changes, Stark Differences: Errors in Otolaryngology
Explore This Issue
September 2014

How to Reduce Diagnostic Error

  • Be aware of cognitive biases.
  • Be open to alternative explanations.
  • Follow up with the patient, as well as ordered tests and referrals.
  • Use objective decision-making tools or algorithms.
  • Review past decisions.

Learn How You Think

The human mind uses rules of thumb that help it to make decisions or quickly slice through an overwhelming amount of input. These shortcuts can also lead to certain types of mistakes—what psychiatry calls “cognitive biases.”

Pat Croskerry, MD, PhD, of Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, has written and lectured on cognitive-related factors in medical decision making. He described the two ways we make decisions: intuitive and rational. Intuitive decision-making is fast and compelling—it is the snap judgment or the gut instinct. Rational decision-making is slower and more deliberate.

While intuitive decision-making often serves physicians well, it is occasionally catastrophic. By virtue of its very speed and certainty, it can blind a physician to considering alternative explanations for a particular patient’s presentation. It’s important to understand that everyone relies on intuitive decision making, that it’s part of human nature, and that you must recognize it in order to overcome it.

What are cognitive biases? Here are some key biases that take place in a physician’s exam room:

  • Anchoring bias. “That’s when you latch on to the first thing you see,” said David Eibling, MD, a professor of otolaryngology at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. By focusing on the most obvious symptom or the most likely diagnosis, a physician may fail to take into account conflicting information.
  • Confirmation bias. Once a physician has a diagnosis in mind, he or she will seek confirming evidence. “But they may forget to look for refuting evidence,” Dr. Eibling said.
  • Availability bias. That’s when a physician relies on recent experience, such as, “I’ve seen four of these cases this month; this must be number five.” By the same token, physicians may miss diseases they haven’t seen for awhile.

Dr. Eibling said it’s worth learning about cognitive biases because it allows you step back and see how you think, then determine where that thinking might lead you astray. Also, he said, it’s reassuring for many physicians to learn that these mistakes are encoded into how our brains work.

“Everybody gets uncomfortable when you start talking about errors,” Dr. Graber said. “But everybody gets interested when you show them the patterns of human error.” For example, you put your car keys down on the kitchen counter instead of in the bowl near the mail and then you can’t find them. Everyone recognizes that scenario, Dr. Graber said. “The silly cognitive mistakes we make in our everyday lives are the same ones that can lead to diagnostic errors.’”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider Tagged With: diagnosisIssue: September 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • AAO-HNS14: Medical Bias Explored As Cause of Medical Errors
  • Few Medical Errors are Reported
  • Admitting Medical Errors Can Help Physicians Learn from Mistakes
  • Small Changes, Stark Differences: Errors in Otolaryngology

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939