• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Health Reform to Insure 32 Million: Are you ready for them?

by Geri Aston • May 2, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The law’s medical malpractice reform provision also is a missed opportunity, Dr. Setzen said. Physicians have stressed that a cap on noneconomic damages is another important part of health system reform, but the act includes no such limit. The measure authorizes funding for five-year state demonstration programs to develop, implement and evaluate alternatives to the current system. “I don’t see how that is going to do anything meaningful in a reasonable timeframe,” Dr. Setzen said.

You Might Also Like

  • A Myth of Modern Medicine: ‘There are 40 million Americans with No Access to Health Care’
  • Health Care as a Commodity: Competition should be focus of health reform, lecturer says
  • Health Reform Perks: Employer tax credits could benefit your practice
  • A Blessing and a Curse: Health care reform comes at a steep price
Explore This Issue
May 2010

Dr. Setzen and others expressed concern about the law’s Medicaid eligibility expansion. Many doctors accept Medicaid patients because they believe they have an obligation to those patients, he said. The payment rates are so low, however, and the administrative burden is so high that providing care to Medicaid patients is essentially equivalent to charity care, he said.

The law increases primary care physicians’ Medicaid payment rates to the Medicare level, but that provision doesn’t apply to specialists, such as otolaryngologists, Drs. Setzen and Johns noted. The low reimbursement level for specialists raises questions about how many of them would be able to afford taking on newly covered Medicaid patients, Dr. Setzen said.

The combination of the Medicare payment cut threat, low Medicaid reimbursement rates and physicians’ medical malpractice issues could limit the health system reform law’s success, Dr. Setzen said. “When you take an already burdened system and there is such a strain with respect to workforce and you introduce 32 million people, access by necessity is going to be limited,” he said.

The act establishes a National Health Care Workforce Commission that will evaluate whether the demand for health care workers is being met and recommend solutions. “That’s something we’re very interested in—how the commission will be structured, what it will do,” Dr. Johns said.

Fear and uncertainty exist in the medical community about the new law’s implications, Dr. Setzen said. “A lot of people are waiting to see how this unfolds.”

It is unclear how the individual mandate and the penalties for businesses that don’t provide coverage will pan out, Dr. Setzen said, pointing out that some individuals and employers could opt to pay the fines rather than buy insurance. “Because the penalties are low and incremental, I think a lot of patients will pay the penalty in the first and second years and still show up in the ER,” he added.

Given the budget crises in the states, physicians also worry whether the state health insurance exchanges are financially sustainable. If the states can’t afford to operate the exchanges, they could become a federal responsibility, Dr. Setzen said. “Is the government the best entity to run the health care system? I’m not convinced of that,” he said. It’s also unclear whether some states will want to create exchanges, Dr. Johns noted. If they don’t, the federal government can step in and develop them. “How that will work and whether that will work remains to be seen,” he said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy Tagged With: affordable care act, healthcare reform, insurance, Medicare, policy, reimbursement, taxIssue: May 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • A Myth of Modern Medicine: ‘There are 40 million Americans with No Access to Health Care’
  • Health Care as a Commodity: Competition should be focus of health reform, lecturer says
  • Health Reform Perks: Employer tax credits could benefit your practice
  • A Blessing and a Curse: Health care reform comes at a steep price

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • 22 Symptoms Common to Patients with Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939