• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

How Gene Editing is Changing Otolaryngology

by Nikki Kean • December 6, 2017

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
© Natali_ Mis / shutterstock.com

© Natali_ Mis / shutterstock.com

Many factors come into play to cause hearing loss. In childhood, almost 50% of cases can be traced to the patient’s genes. Genetic testing promises to help identify such hearing loss before it has progressed, or potentially even before birth, while also helping to steer treatment—most notably, by identifying candidates for a new groundbreaking gene-editing strategy that selectively removes defective genes and eliminates the risk of inheriting the trait for future generations.

You Might Also Like

  • Newly Identified Gene May Be Linked to Progressive Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • Gene Therapy: A Promising Role in Otolaryngology
  • Otolaryngology Research Increasingly Supports Genetic Screening to Evaluate Pediatric Hearing Loss
  • First Two Patients Respond to Gene Therapy in Melanoma Study
Explore This Issue
December 2017

To explore the current status of gene editing in the field of otolaryngology, ENTtoday spoke with a number of leading researchers in the field.

Genes Involved in Hearing Loss

Researchers have identified 46 known genes involved in non-syndromic hearing loss, and expect to discover more. The most frequent genes implicated in recessive non-syndromic hearing loss are GJB2 (connexin 26 gene), which is responsible for more than half of cases, followed by SLC26A4, MYO15A, OTOF, CDH23 and TMC1 (Mutat Res. 2009;681[2-3]:189-196).

Although the majority of hereditary hearing loss is non-syndromic, many genetic syndromes also cause deafness, including neurofibromatosis type 2 and Usher syndrome. In addition, age-related hearing loss is thought to have a genetic component (SNPs rs4932196 and rs58389158), although the exact genetic cause(s) of the disease is still being elucidated (PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1006371).

The discovery of genetic mutations has come with a whole host of potential genetic therapies; however, “the dominant deafness genes cannot be corrected with gene replacement strategies, so researchers are turning to gene-editing approaches to correct those types of hearing losses: either silencing RNA (siRNA) or CRISPR strategies,” said Hinrich Staecker, MD, PhD, the David and Mary Zamierowsky Professor of otolaryngology at the University of Kansas School of Medicine in Kansas City.

CRISPR, which stands for clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats, uses the Cas9 enzyme to cut a specific target sequence on a mutant gene—cutting both strands of the DNA. Repair enzymes can then be inserted to repair and seal the cut with new genetic information, permanently changing the underlying genetic code. A landmark study in Nature reported the results of using CRISPR-Cas9 to correct a mutation in a gene that causes hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in human embryos (Nature. 2017;548:13–14). Researchers have questioned the findings of that study, however (see “Landmark Gene-Editing Study Called into Question,”).

The Promise of Gene Editing

“Gene editing is now much simpler and better than it has ever been. Even though we have tried to edit genes for a long time, the relatively recent discovery of the CRISPR-Cas technology, in which we can discreetly edit parts of the gene, is very exciting,” said D. Bradley Welling, MD, PhD, the Walter Augustus LeCompte Professor and chair of the department of otolaryngology at Harvard Medical School in Boston, and editor of ENTtoday’s sister publication Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Home Slider, Special Reports Tagged With: clinical best practices, gene editing, gene replacement, gene replacement for hearing loss, hearing lossIssue: December 2017

You Might Also Like:

  • Newly Identified Gene May Be Linked to Progressive Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • Gene Therapy: A Promising Role in Otolaryngology
  • Otolaryngology Research Increasingly Supports Genetic Screening to Evaluate Pediatric Hearing Loss
  • First Two Patients Respond to Gene Therapy in Melanoma Study

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939