• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

FDA Issues Class I Notice of Recall of Some Philips Respironics CPAP, BiPAP Masks

by Amy E. Hamaker • October 20, 2022

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently sent a safety communication regarding the Class I recall of certain Philips Respironics CPAP and BiPAP masks due to magnets in headgear clips that could interfere with some implanted metallic medical devices and metallic objects in the body. (Originally, this recall was voluntary, but was changed to Class I on Oct. 19, 2022. Class I recalls are the most severe type of FDA recall, meaning that there is a potential for serious injury or death.)

You Might Also Like

  • FDA’s Unique Identifier Program Has Benefits, Drawbacks
  • Tracheostomy Tubes Added to FDA Medical Device Shortage List
  • Surgical Issues: Insights into UPPP, CPAP Use, and CSF Leaks
  • FDA Recalls Zantac

The potential adverse events (injury or death) can occur in people who use the masks or in people who are near to a person using the mask.

Source: FDA

If they come within 6 inches of the body, the magnets could affect pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, metallic stents, neurostimulators, magnetic metallic implants, electrodes, and valves near the head, cerebral spinal fluid shunts, aneurysm clips, embolic coils, intracranial aneurysm intravascular flow disruption devices, metallic cranial plates, screws, burr hole covers, and bone substitute devices, ocular implants, certain contact lenses with metal, implants to restore hearing or balance that have an implanted magnet (including cochlear implants, implanted bone conduction hearing devices, and auditory brainstem implants), magnetic denture attachments, implantable ports and pumps, metallic gastrointestinal clips, certain metallic joint replacements, devices labeled as magnetic resonance (MR) unsafe, magnetic metallic implants not labeled for MR or not evaluated for safety in a magnetic field, and metallic splinters in the eye or metallic shrapnel in the body.

Any questions on mask substitutes can be directed to Philips customer service at 800-345-6443 or www.usa.philips.com; reports of injuries to patients can be sent via the FDA’s MedWatch Voluntary Reporting Form at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch/index.cfm?action=reporting.home).

Filed Under: Online Exclusives Tagged With: CPAP, recall

You Might Also Like:

  • FDA’s Unique Identifier Program Has Benefits, Drawbacks
  • Tracheostomy Tubes Added to FDA Medical Device Shortage List
  • Surgical Issues: Insights into UPPP, CPAP Use, and CSF Leaks
  • FDA Recalls Zantac

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Where do you prefer to do tympanostomy tube insertions?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • History of the Cochlear Implant

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • The Flute Player
    • Intelligence Can Not be Artificial
    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?
    • Leading During Uncertainty in Healthcare
    • MenQOL Assessment Instrument Yields Promising Initial Results

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939