• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

EMR and Advertising: Strange Bedfellows?

by Angela Munasque • July 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Michael S. Benninger, MD, Chair of the Head and Neck Institute at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio, shared these concerns. If I’m utilizing a tool to take care of individual patients, where there are biases being introduced, and those biases are largely financially driven, not necessarily qualitatively driven, and there’s no true editorial censorship, to me, that raises major ethical issues, he said.

You Might Also Like

  • Update Your Practice: Follow these tips to select the right EMR for your group
  • COSM 2012: TRIO Guest of Honor Cautions against Physician Advertising
  • Face Time: Ask the right questions when meeting with EMR vendors
  • Lessons Learned: How to overcome the cultural barriers to EMR implementation
Explore This Issue
July 2008

Dr. Benninger doesn’t take issue with advertisements in general. He views advertisements that accompany Internet pages when he specifically searches for certain conditions or treatments as acceptable. In addition, ads appeared in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, for which he served as editor from 2000 through 2006. We had no trouble with advertisements, he explained.

However, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery created policies that stated that no advertisements could be within a certain number of pages of an article of the same content. For example, he explained that if there were an article on allergic rhinitis on one page, accompanied by an advertisement for allergy medication, whether it’s an indirect or direct affect, it biases individuals. Dr. Benninger stated simply, The article should be independent from any advertisement.

Regarding Practice Fusion, Dr. Benninger stands firm about the separation of commercialism and medicine: Industry trying to bias providers in the context of a medical exchange for an individual patient is absolutely inappropriate.

Pharma and Privacy

Another, more specific concern both professionals and laypeople have seems to be the ever-encroaching presence of pharmaceutical companies. Mr. Howard does not dismiss these as trivial. It’s kind of a double-edged sword for physicians today. Our chief medical officer, if he were in this conversation, would argue that the advertising is much less intrusive than actually having a pharma rep come onsite, he said.

For the record, at the time of the interview, there were no pharmaceutical advertisements in Practice Fusion, according to Mr. Howard: A lot of our partnerships are dictation, transcription, and billing services. To which Dr. Benninger responded, But how do we know those are the best services?

Beyond this, privacy matters-always a hot topic in health care, especially with HIPAA and with the boom of health information technology-continue to cause anxiety. Mr. Howard assured, All the ads are triggered off physician demographics and specialties, very nonprivate pieces of information.

He explained that Practice Fusion never sells any private patient or physician information. This is to protect the patients, the physicians, and themselves: The reality is if we compromise that, we’ll compromise our model, and we’ll be out of business. You haven’t heard about [breaches in privacy] because it hasn’t happened [with Practice Fusion].

More Questions

At the end of the day, at least for now, it seems that Practice Fusion, a proposed solution to the looming question of how to establish electronic medical records, conjures up at least as many questions as it does answers.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Everyday Ethics, Health Policy, Practice Management, Tech Talk Tagged With: advertising, EHR, electronic health records, Ethics, healthcare reform, marketing, patient safety, pharmaceuticals, policy, practice management, technologyIssue: July 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Update Your Practice: Follow these tips to select the right EMR for your group
  • COSM 2012: TRIO Guest of Honor Cautions against Physician Advertising
  • Face Time: Ask the right questions when meeting with EMR vendors
  • Lessons Learned: How to overcome the cultural barriers to EMR implementation

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • 22 Symptoms Common to Patients with Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939