• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

CT Scanning of the Paranasal Sinuses: Indications, Utilization, and Radiation Risks

by Sue Pondrom • August 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Efficacy of Testing

The question then arises: Do all the tests ordered by otolaryngologists really add to improvement in patient diagnosis and treatment?

You Might Also Like

  • ARS Spread to Paranasal Sinuses, OMC Obstruction May Not Be Etiological Factors in Bacterial ARS Development
  • Fanconi Anemia Patients with HNSCC Tolerate Surgery Better than Radiation, Chemotherapy
  • Radiation Exposure Alters Airway Deformability during Laryngoscopy
  • Indications for Surgical Intervention
Explore This Issue
August 2007

Rakesh K. (Rick) Chandra, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor at the University of Tennessee College of Medicine in Memphis, discussed currently accepted indications for CT scans, questionable circumstances for ordering imaging services, and research studies regarding CT scan effectiveness in diagnosis.

Ramon E. Figueroa, MD

Ramon E. Figueroa, MD

Most of us will probably agree that CT is not necessary for routine diagnosis and treatment of acute sinusitis, he said, because the CT doesn’t distinguish acute sinusitis from a viral upper respiratory infection. Most of us base our decision to treat with antibiotics, based on symptoms and the time course.

He added that physicians will obtain a CT scan frequently when there are any suspected orbital complications, if there is pending or suspected intracranial complication, if the diagnosis is in doubt, or if the patient fails consecutive courses of appropriate antibiotics. Additionally, a CT would probably be ordered for a suspected neoplasm, chronic rhinosinusitis of more than 12 weeks that has failed maximal medical therapy, polyposis, and suspected allergic fungal sinusitis (AFS) or mucocele.

The when-to-order dilemma, he said, occurs with patients under the following circumstances:

  • Patients with suspected chronic rhinosinusitis who have negative CTs. He referred to a 2006 study where only dysosmia and polyps correlated with a positive CT scan.
  • Patients without chronic rhinosinusitis often have positive CTs. A New England Journal of Medicine study in 1994 indicated a positive CT for patients with an upper respiratory tract infection; when the CT was repeated two weeks later in about half the patients, 79% had resolved or improved.
  • CT does not explain sinus headaches. Dr. Chandra said that multiple studies refute correlation between site of headache/facial pain symptoms and extent or distribution of disease by CT. In addition, CT findings have been correlated with obstruction, discharge, hyposmia, sleep problems, and fatigue.

Questioning whether CT can measure the severity of chronic rhinosinusitis, Dr. Chandra noted a study with 53 patients who had symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis-27 had a normal CT, whereas 26 had an abnormal CT. Another study found no correlation between Lund-McKay scores and overall SNOT-20 or CSS scores.

Regarding nasal polyposis, it appears that CT can measure response to medical treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis patients without nasal polyposis, but questions arise as to whether improvement is secondary to medical treatment or due to the natural history of the disease process. In addition, Dr. Chandra asked, did serial CTs change the management of who needed prolonged treatment or surgery?

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Features, Head and Neck, Practice Focus, Rhinology, Tech Talk Issue: August 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • ARS Spread to Paranasal Sinuses, OMC Obstruction May Not Be Etiological Factors in Bacterial ARS Development
  • Fanconi Anemia Patients with HNSCC Tolerate Surgery Better than Radiation, Chemotherapy
  • Radiation Exposure Alters Airway Deformability during Laryngoscopy
  • Indications for Surgical Intervention

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939