• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

COSM14: HPV Status and Prognosis for Oropharyngeal Cancers

by Thomas R. Collins • July 1, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The main vaccine target group in the U.S. is 11- to 12-year-old girls who have not yet become sexually active. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for the Centers for Disease Control, as of October 2011, also recommends routine vaccination of boys between nine and 21 years old.

You Might Also Like

  • HPV Status an Independent Prognostic Factor for Oropharyngeal Cancer Survival
  • HPV-Oropharyngeal Cancer Link May Affect Cancer Screening and Prognosis: The link offers potential for improved detection and prevention, but more research is needed
  • Slowing the Rise of Oropharyngeal Cancers
  • HPV Related to Rise in Head and Neck Cancers
Explore This Issue
July 2014

Quadrivalent HPV vaccines are highly effective at preventing infections, but more effort needs to be put into encouraging parents to get their children vaccinated to further prevent recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP), said Craig Derkay, MD, director of pediatric otolaryngology at Eastern Virginia Medical School in Norfolk.

From the AudienceThere have been a few interesting talks about [RRP], a lot of good research on … its association with HPV. I think it’s really interesting, especially the [information] about tumor heterogeneity. In cancer, that’s what everyone is coming to realize: that these tumors are complex and so heterogeneous, and that’s probably why there’s such a different response to treatment types.—Danielle Eytan, BS
Cleveland Clinic medical student and NIH researcher

At up to five years of follow-up, the vaccines were 100% effective at preventing the HPV 6- and 11-types, which are responsible for causing RRP. Data suggest that the vaccine provides long-term protection, with VLP [virus-like particle] antibody titer levels that plateau at about 18 months following the vaccination course, suggesting no need for future booster doses, Dr. Derkay added.

Two recent papers suggest that the vaccine could have some therapeutic value for treating RRP. In one of the studies, in which 11 adults with RRP were given the vaccine, six of them were disease-free at one year, three of them had fewer recurrences, and two had no change (International Papillomavirus Conference 2011. OP-236). Moreover, the vaccine will protect against the most common HPV subtypes responsible for causing oropharyngeal cancer.

Despite the evidence that vaccines work, Dr. Derkay noted that vaccine uptake rates have not changed since 2011, requiring an increased effort by otolaryngologists to promote vaccination among the families they treat. “There is an anti-vaccine movement in the United States,” in part because some think the vaccines will lead to earlier sexual behavior, he said. “I think that’s a fallacy in the same way that encouraging seat belt use encourages you to drive drunk.”

Treatment Courses

James Rocco, MD, PhD, director of head and neck cancer research at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and the Daniel Miller Associate Professor of Otology and Laryngology at Harvard Medical School in Boston, delved into new ways of assessing how well different patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer will respond to different treatments. “There are lots of different treatment options, and we really have no way to know which are best in terms of survival and function,” he said, even though it’s known that some patients are being overtreated and are thus at unnecessary risk of serious side effects.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Head and Neck, Practice Focus Tagged With: cancer, HPVIssue: July 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • HPV Status an Independent Prognostic Factor for Oropharyngeal Cancer Survival
  • HPV-Oropharyngeal Cancer Link May Affect Cancer Screening and Prognosis: The link offers potential for improved detection and prevention, but more research is needed
  • Slowing the Rise of Oropharyngeal Cancers
  • HPV Related to Rise in Head and Neck Cancers

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • 22 Symptoms Common to Patients with Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939