• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Behind the Red Tape: A brief history of common health care regulations

by Michael O'Neal • November 5, 2011

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Who/What: CMS published the amendment to its Conditions of Participation (CoPs) for health care organizations to address procedures for documenting history and physical examinations to properly bill Medicare. The ruling lengthened the allotted time given to doctors to document a patient’s history and physical examination from seven to 30 days before the patient is admitted to the hospital.

You Might Also Like

  • Where the Presidential Candidates Stand on Key Health Care Issues
  • A Blessing and a Curse: Health care reform comes at a steep price
  • Health Care as a Commodity: Competition should be focus of health reform, lecturer says
  • A Myth of Modern Medicine: ‘There are 40 million Americans with No Access to Health Care’
Explore This Issue
November 2011

Why: According to a memorandum from the director of the Survey and Certification Group at the CMS, the history and physical documentation regulations were adjusted to ease the burden of physicians who were required to perform history and physical exams no more than seven days before a patient’s hospital admission.

In Practice: Now physicians may administer an exam up to 30 days before a patient is admitted. However, they still may only give an exam up to 24 hours after the patient is admitted.

Sources:

  1. Whitman B. CMS changes hospitals rules for completing history and physical documentation. ACP Internist. April 2007.
  2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Center for Medicaid and State Operations/Survey and Certification Group. Hospitals—publication of the hospital condition of participation: requirements for history and physical examinations; authentication of verbal orders; securing medications; and post-anesthesia evaluations final rule. CMS January 26, 2007.

The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act

 

The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA)

When: The EMTALA was originally passed in 1986.

Who/What: The U.S. Congress enacted the EMTALA to allow people to receive emergency medical care whether or not they can pay for it. The CMS defends the law through provisions in sections 1866 and 1867 of the Social Security Act.

Why: The law was passed to ensure that hospitals would not turn away any person in need of emergency care just because they could not pay to visit the emergency room.

In Practice: Medicare-specified hospitals with emergency services must provide a medical screening examination upon request to patients with emergency medical conditions and attempt to stabilize them. Hospitals must also provide transfers to patients who request them, as well as to those the hospital is unable to stabilize.

Update: On December 23, 2010, CMS published a notice of proposed rule updates to the EMTALA with reference to “hospital and critical access hospital inpatients and hospitals with specialized capabilities.” The notice solicited public comment on the issue, with a submission deadline of February 22, 2011.

Sources:

  1. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. EMTALA overview.
  2. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Proposed rule. Medicare program; emergency medical treatment and labor act: applicability to hospital and critical access hospital inpatients and hospitals with specialized capabilities. Federal Register. December 23, 2010.

HIPAA: The Privacy Rule

 

HIPAA: The Privacy Rule

When: The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) originally passed in 1996.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Health Policy Tagged With: health policy, history, regulationIssue: November 2011

You Might Also Like:

  • Where the Presidential Candidates Stand on Key Health Care Issues
  • A Blessing and a Curse: Health care reform comes at a steep price
  • Health Care as a Commodity: Competition should be focus of health reform, lecturer says
  • A Myth of Modern Medicine: ‘There are 40 million Americans with No Access to Health Care’

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use AI-powered scribes for documentation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • How to: Positioning for Middle Cranial Fossa Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • The Importance of Time Away
    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 
    • Reflections from a Past President of the Triological Society
    • ENT Surgeons Explore the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Powered Scribes: Revolutionizing Documentation in Healthcare
    • How To: Open Expansion Laryngoplasty for Combined Glottic and Subglottic Stenosis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939