• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

A Clinical Challenge: Nasal valve compromise can be a dicey problem, panelists say

by Thomas R. Collins • February 7, 2011

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

“Unfortunately, I see a lot of this in my practice,” Dr. Toriumi said. “It’s a combination of repair with lateral wall structural grafting. But I also have to replace tissue. I have to put vestibular lining back.”

You Might Also Like

  • Are Diagnostic Tests Useful for Nasal Valve Compromise?
  • Z-plasty May Be Effective Option for Nasal Valve Collapse
  • COSM13: Complex Cases, High Stakes Pose Challenge for Plastic Surgeons
  • Sponsored Supplement: New Paradigms in the Treatment of Nasal Airway Obstruction
Explore This Issue
February 2011

Also challenging are cases of previous intercartilaginous incisions that haven’t healed properly, leaving scarring.Once the scar tissue is removed, “you’re left with raw mucosal surface, and in order to correct that, you need to bring in tissue,” he said.

William Shockley, MD, chief of facial plastic and reconstructive surgery at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, discussed the tension nose, in which the dorsum is too high, and the saddle nose, in which the dorsum is too low. Both can be linked to nasal obstruction.

Neither problem has been well studied, so there is not much data on the effect that surgeries have had on patients with nasal obstruction.

But Dr. Shockley said that they generally yield good results. “For the tension nose,” he said, “if you can lower the dorsum, widen the cartilaginous vault and, secondarily, deproject the nasal tip, they typically get improvement in their cross-sectional nasal airway, and usually an improvement in internal and external nasal valve function.”

Similarly, if the saddle nose is corrected by elevating the dorsum, supporting the middle vault, reprojecting the tip and correcting any tip ptosis, there is generally improved internal nasal valve function and, in some patients, better external function, too, Dr. Shockley said.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Facial Plastic/Reconstructive, Medical Education, News, Rhinology Tagged With: facial plastic surgery, patient history, rhinologyIssue: February 2011

You Might Also Like:

  • Are Diagnostic Tests Useful for Nasal Valve Compromise?
  • Z-plasty May Be Effective Option for Nasal Valve Collapse
  • COSM13: Complex Cases, High Stakes Pose Challenge for Plastic Surgeons
  • Sponsored Supplement: New Paradigms in the Treatment of Nasal Airway Obstruction

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you experienced an increase in in-office rhinology procedures in the last year?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • History of the Cochlear Implant

    • ChatGPT-Generated “Fake” References in Academic Manuscripts Is a Problem 

    • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Questions on NIH Funding Leave ENT Researchers Pondering Next Steps and Leaving Everything Up in the Air
    • In-Office Rhinology Practices Continue to Grow
    • How Do We Define “Winning” in the OR?
    • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
    • How To: Superior Maximization of Sphenoidotomy with Olfaction Preservation in Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939