• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

A Better Look: Emerging imaging technologies show promise in fighting head and neck tumors

by Thomas R. Collins • April 4, 2011

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Dr. Zinn added that interpretation of MR images in PET/MR scanning will be more difficult than CT was for PET/CT scanning. “Some feel nuclear medicine physicians will be replaced by radiologists in the future,” he said in an e-mail. “Nuclear medicine was able to add CT training, but that will be harder to do for MR.”

You Might Also Like

  • PET/CT Useful for Head and Neck Cancers, with Limitations
  • Surgeons Describe How They Use Fluorescence to Guide Work on Head and Neck Tumors
  • Nuclear Medical Imaging Is Recommended in the Diagnosis and Management of Head and Neck Paragangliomas
  • When Should Surveillance Imaging Be Performed After Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer?
Explore This Issue
April 2011

Finding enough board-certified radiologists to read PET/MR scans may be one early challenge, he said.

New PET Tracers

PET scanning has been limited by the availability of the tracers used to detect tumors. The most commonly used tracer, fluorodeoxyglucose, or FDG, highlights areas of glycolysis, which is heightened in tumor cells. FDG can lead to false positives, however, because glycolysis is also heightened during inflammation and tissue repair.

New tracers are being developed to tailor to other metabolic activities that could give insights into what is happening in cancer cells, Dr. Wax said, citing a study from the Journal of Nuclear Medicine (2010;51:66-76).

“Every cancer is not the same, and with improved probes to image specific processes, we can tailor our therapies and treatments to the individual patient,” Dr. Zinn said. “Right now we can treat tumors differently depending on certain classification. But we can probably do a lot better at characterizing them by using molecular markers to help us know exactly how to treat, and, more importantly, during the treatment, to evaluate whether the tumor’s changing.”

Immuno-PET tracers, in which specially formulated antibodies are particularly reactive with a receptor that is more highly expressed in tumor cells, is an area of great promise, Dr. Wax said.

Epidermal growth factor-based and vascular endothelial growth factor-based antibodies are among those being used in these tracers.

18-F-FLT (18-F fluorodeoxythymidine) and 18-F-FMISO (18-F fluromisonidazole) are two of the more promising agents. FLT would help assess tumor proliferation, and FMISO is used to gauge hypoxia.

“It’s possible that we may be able to target specific areas of tumor sites, where they’re undergoing metabolic changes, parts of the tumor that are hypoxic, parts of the tumor that are showing angiogenesis, and then be able to target our therapies towards those areas,” Dr. Wax said. That’s really abstract, pie-in-the-sky type things, but I think that’s along the lines of what we’re trying to do.”

Dr. Wax emphasized that the new tracers are still only the subject of lab work, and the cost is an unknown. Any training would involve the interpretation and preparation of the materials, but how long that training would take is also undetermined, he said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Clinical, Departments, Head and Neck, Special Reports Tagged With: cancer, Head & neck surgery, technologyIssue: April 2011

You Might Also Like:

  • PET/CT Useful for Head and Neck Cancers, with Limitations
  • Surgeons Describe How They Use Fluorescence to Guide Work on Head and Neck Tumors
  • Nuclear Medical Imaging Is Recommended in the Diagnosis and Management of Head and Neck Paragangliomas
  • When Should Surveillance Imaging Be Performed After Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • 22 Symptoms Common to Patients with Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939