• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Insertion Trauma Rate Lower in Lateral Wall Arrays Than Perimodiolar Arrays Following Cochlear Implantation

by Linda Kossoff • June 28, 2021

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

How do lateral wall (LW) and perimodiolar (PM) electrode arrays compare with respect to potentially trauma-inducing scalar translocation (STL) in cochlear implants (CI)?

BOTTOM LINE

You Might Also Like

  • Intracochlear Fibrosis After Cochlear Implant Limits Success
  • COSM14: Award Winners Tackle Cochlear Implantation, Regrowth of Inner Ear Hair Cells
  • Cochlear Implantation Has Varying Effect on Tinnitus
  • Off-Label Cochlear Implantation Common
Explore This Issue
June 2021

LW arrays are preferable to PM arrays for minimizing clinically relevant intracochlear trauma in cochlear implantation.

BACKGROUND: The two distinguishable types of electrode arrays used in cochlear implantation are LW and PM. Postoperatively, STL of the electrode array may occur, causing intracochlear trauma and negatively affecting patient’s hearing performance. Therefore, it is relevant to compare the performances of LW and PM arrays in terms of STL.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review.

SETTING: Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

SYNOPSIS: Researchers conducted a systematic search for postoperative CT data on the occurrence of large insertion trauma of the electrode array following CI between May 1, 2009, and June 1, 2020. Of the 2,128 unique articles retrieved, 33 were included for analysis. The baseline characteristics of the analyzed studies were extracted. The investigators also identified and conducted a meta-analysis of an STL cohort of five comparative studies to specifically compare STL rate of LW and PM arrays. The meta-analysis showed that the STL rate is significantly lower for the LW than the PM arrays (7% vs. 43%). STL occurred predominantly at 180 degrees intracochlearly. Overall, postoperative speech perception and preservation of residual hearing were found to be poorer for the cochlear implantation patients with STL compared to those without an STL. Based on this study’s findings, researchers concluded that LW arrays would be the preferred option for cochlear implantation for the current medical practice. Study limitations included a lack of randomization or standardization of surgical insertion approaches and the focus on only large insertion trauma.

Citation: Jwair S, Prins A, Wegner I, et al. Scalar translocation comparison between lateral wall and perimodiolar cochlear implant array—a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2021;131:1358-1368.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology Tagged With: clinical outcomesIssue: June 2021

You Might Also Like:

  • Intracochlear Fibrosis After Cochlear Implant Limits Success
  • COSM14: Award Winners Tackle Cochlear Implantation, Regrowth of Inner Ear Hair Cells
  • Cochlear Implantation Has Varying Effect on Tinnitus
  • Off-Label Cochlear Implantation Common

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Has experience as a patient influenced your professional development or demeanor?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Path to Department Chair: Arriving and Thriving

    • How Audiologists and Researchers Are Shaping Military Hearing Health Practices

    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer

    • Rewriting the Rules of Rhinosinusitis

    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Why So Loud? Rethinking the Volume of Our Everyday Experiences
    • How Audiologists and Researchers Are Shaping Military Hearing Health Practices
    • A Case for Endoscopic Surgery: How Personal Experience Influenced Pursuit of a New Skill
    • The Path to Department Chair: Arriving and Thriving
    • Rewriting the Rules of Rhinosinusitis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939