• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Sarcopenia Significantly Associated with Poorer Overall Survival of Patients with Head and Neck Cancers

by Linda Kossoff • February 16, 2021

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Is radiologically defined sarcopenia at the C3 or L3 level prognostic of overall survival (OS) in head and neck cancers (HNCs)?

BOTTOM LINE: Pretreatment sarcopenia as radiologically defined by decreased skeletal muscle index (SMI) or skeletal muscle mass (SMM) correlates with poor survival in HNC patients.

You Might Also Like

  • Travel Distance Alone Not Associated with Worsened Two-Year Survival in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Head and Neck Cancer
  • Depression Affects Two-Year Survival Rates in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
  • Survival for Advanced Head, Neck Cancer Improvements May Be Related to PET
  • High-Volume Hospitals, Surgeons Better Predictors of Overall Survival in Head, Neck Cancer
Explore This Issue
February 2021

BACKGROUND: Research findings associate sarcopenia, defined via computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with negative outcomes in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, no higher evidence is available specifically to assess the prognostication of HNC using radiologically defined sarcopenia.

STUDY DESIGN: Literature review and meta-analysis.

SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, N.Y.

SYNOPSIS: To examine the relationship between radiologically defined sarcopenia and OS in HNCs, the researcher used 10 studies (nine retrospective, one prospective) published between 2016 and 2019, each ranging from 85 to 441 patients. Although each study reported on HNSCC OS in sarcopenic patients, the specific cancer sites in each study varied. All studies used CT, MRI, or both, and all reported OS as an outcome. Eight of the 10 studies found that radiologically defined sarcopenia was significantly associated with worse OS. The authors found no significant heterogeneity between studies. The majority of studies used L3 SMI to determine the cutoffs for sarcopenia, although authors found evidence that C3 skeletal mass measurement could be a reliable measurement tool as well. Pooled data showed that sarcopenia was significantly associated with poorer OS of patients with HNCs. Although the exact pathogenesis of sarcopenia is unknown and there remains no universal diagnostic definition of sarcopenia, authors conclude that radiologically defined sarcopenia might be a useful tool to identify patients who might benefit from adjuvant or additional therapies. Study limitations included variation of cancer sites and sarcopenia definition criteria.

CITATION: Wong A, Zhu D, Kraus D, Tham T. Radiologically defined sarcopenia affects survival in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis [published online ahead of print March 27, 2020]. Laryngoscope. doi:10.1002/lary.28616.

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Head and Neck, Literature Reviews Tagged With: clinical outcome, head and neck cancer, mortality rate, treatmentIssue: February 2021

You Might Also Like:

  • Travel Distance Alone Not Associated with Worsened Two-Year Survival in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Head and Neck Cancer
  • Depression Affects Two-Year Survival Rates in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
  • Survival for Advanced Head, Neck Cancer Improvements May Be Related to PET
  • High-Volume Hospitals, Surgeons Better Predictors of Overall Survival in Head, Neck Cancer

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • MRI Surveillance Should Extend to 10 Years Post- Op for Vestibular Schwannoma Patients
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939